![]() |
Does food aid do more harm than good?
by srinathreddy82 on Sep 15, 2007      Category: Food & Water Tags:
Is all food aid really necessary, or is it a part of the bigger food politics going around these days? There's also a more detailed document by Oxfam on the same.
http://www.oxfam.org/en/files/bp71_food_aid_240305.pdf/download
up
5 users have voted.
2 Comments

recent comments
Mounica
on Volunteers needed in Bangalore to write exams for blind students
Hi am Mounica, postgraduate currently housewife 4m chennai would like to help needy in writg exams...
suresh n
on Project SEAM of Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India...
Technopak is big Cheating in Karnataka. What has done Skill for employment in Apprel manufacturing...
suresh n
on Project SEAM of Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India...
TECHNOPAK IS BIG CHEATED COMPANY
The Implementing...
kummara vamsi
on LIC Scholarships for College Students
SIR, I secured 97.4% in my intermediate.I want to study b.tech course but we dont have that much...










Comments
I think the problems are way more complicated. Food aid might be absolutely necessary in some cases, Kenya for example (which for some reason has fallen off the media radar lately, and all that we hear these days is about the inflation in Zimbabwe), but then it should be followed by many more essentials. Are the local food distribution systems any good? What is being done to solve the problem on a longer-term basis by building up local agricultural capacity? Is the leadership of the country to be blamed instead of blind US bashing, for creating a false image of food scarcity in the country? I think it is only after analyzing multiple factors that conclusions should be made.
In general, I somehow don't like broad claims and analysis done by journalists. They always seem to portray stories to create a sensation rather than provide an actual scientific analysis. Good analysis generally does exist, but it is largely incomprehensible for most people. Instead of bringing more clarity to issues, the media often creates more confusions.
The article does not address emergency food aid in wake of disasters, but continuous food aid for chronic malnutrition. The main concern for most NGOs now is that nothing has been done to build a sustainable agricultural capacity in the affected countries which is the only long lasting solution to this issue, and it seems that both donors and recipients seem content to keep things that way.
For example, Ehtiopia and Mali are totally dependent on food aid for over 20 years now. The agricultural system is non-existent, due to both ineffectual leadership/system and the fact the imported food is cheaper (dumping excess food by donors?) than any food that can be grown locally, which dissuades farmers from growing crops. The result is near complete dependance on food aid every year. Also any efforts to help the recipient with seeds and fertilizers are viewed with suspicion (GM crops), which may not be totally off the mark.
Add new comment